Fahrig, L.: Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S., 34, 487–515, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419, 2003.
Goodwin, B. J. and Fahrig, L.: How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity?, Oikos, 99, 552–570, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11824.x, 2002.
Grimm, V., Berger, U., Bastiansen, F., Eliassen, S., Ginot, V., Giske, J., Goss-Custard, J., Grand, T., Heinz, S. K., Huse, G., Huth, A., Jepsen, J. U., Jorgensen, C., Mooij, W. M., Muller, B., Pe'er, G., Piou, C., Railsback, S. F., Robbins, A. M., Robbins, M. M., Rossmanith, E., Ruger, N., Strand, E., Souissi, S., Stillman, R. A., Vabo, R., Visser, U., and DeAngelis, D. L.: A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models, Ecol. Model., 198, 115–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023, 2006.
Grimm, V., Berger, U., DeAngelis, D. L., Polhill, J. G., Giske, J., and Railsback, S. F.: The ODD protocol: A review and first update, Ecol. Model., 221, 2760–2768, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.019, 2010.
Gustafson, E. J. and Gardner, R. H.: The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization, Ecology, 77, 94–107, https://doi.org/10.2307/2265659, 1996.
Hamer, A. J. and McDonnell, M. J.: Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: A review, Biol. Conserv., 141, 2432–2449, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.020, 2008.
Hanski, I.: Metapopulation dynamics, Nature, 396, 41–49, https://doi.org/10.1038/23876, 1998.
Hanski, I. and Simberloff, D.: The Metapopulation Approach, Its history, Conceptual domain, and Application to Conservation, in: Metapopulation Biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution, edited by: Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. E., Academic Press, Inc., 1997.
Hartung, H.: Untersuchung zur terrestrischen Biologie von Populationen des Moorfrosches (
Rana arvalis NILSSON 1842) unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Jahresmobilität, Ph.D. thesis, Fachbereiches Biologie, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, 1991.
Haynes, K. J., Diekotter, T., and Crist, T. O.: Resource complementation and the response of an insect herbivore to habitat area and fragmentation, Oecologia, 153, 511–520, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0749-4, 2007.
Hels, T.: Population dynamics in a Danish metapopulation of spadefoot toads
Pelobates fuscus, Ecography, 25, 303–313, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250307.x, 2002.
Jaeger, J. A. G.: Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation, Landscape Ecol., 15, 115–130, 2000.
Jaquiéry, J., Guélat, J., Broquet, T., Berset-Brändli, L., Pellegrini, E., Moresi, R., Hirzel, a. H., and Perrin, N.: Habitat-quality effects on metapopulation dynamics in greater white-toothed shrews,
Crocidura russula, Ecology, 89, 2777–2785, 2008.
Johnson, J. R., Knouft, J. H., and Semlitsch, R. D.: Sex and seasonal differences in the spatial terrestrial distribution of gray treefrog (
Hyla versicolor) populations, Biol. Conserv., 140, 250–258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.08.010, 2007.
Kindlmann, P. and Burel, F.: Connectivity measures: a review, Landscape Ecol., 23, 879–890, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9245-4, 2008.
Lehtinen, R. M., Ramanamanjato, J. B., and Raveloarison, J. G.: Edge effects and extinction proneness in a herpetofauna from Madagascar, Biodivers. Conserv., 12, 1357–1370, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023673301850, 2003.
Loman, J.: Density and survival of
Rana arvalis and
Rana temporaria, Alytes, 3, 125–134, 1984.
Loman, J.: Site tenacity, within and between summers, of
Rana arvalis and
Rana temporaria, Alytes, 12, 15–29, 1994.
Marsh, D.: Metapopulation viability analysis for amphibians, Anim. Conserv., 11, 463–465, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00223.x, 2008.
Moilanen, A. and Hanski, I.: Metapopulation dynamics: Effects of habitat quality and landscape structure, Ecology, 79, 2503–2515, 1998.
Moilanen, A. and Hanski, I.: On the use of connectivity measures in spatial ecology, Oikos, 95, 147–151, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950116.x, 2001.
Moilanen, A. and Hanski, I.: Connectivity and metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes, in: Connectivity Conservation, edited by: Crooks, K. R. and Sanjayan, M., Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Pfenning, B., Hovestadt, T., and Poethke, H. J.: The effect of patch constellation on the exchange of individuals between habitat-islands, Ecol. Model., 180, 515–522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.04.035, 2004.
Pillsbury, F. C. and Miller, J. R.: Habitat and landscape characteristics underlying anuran community structure along an urban-rural gradient, Ecol. Appl., 18, 1107–1118, https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1899.1, 2008.
Pontoppidan, M.-B. and Nachman, G.: Spatial Amphibian Impact Assessment – a management tool for assessment of road effects on regional populations of Moor frogs (
Rana arvalis), Nat. Conserv., in press, 2013a.
Pontoppidan, M.-B. and Nachman, G.: Changes in behavioural responses to infrastructure affect local and regional connectivity – a simulation study on pond breeding amphibians, Nat. Conserv., in press, 2013b.
Prevedello, J. A. and Vieira, M. V.: Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence, Biodivers. Conserv., 19, 1205–1223, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9750-z, 2010.
Puglis, H. J. and Boone, M. D.: Effects of terrestrial buffer zones on amphibians on golf courses, PLoS ONE, 7, e39590, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039590, 2012.
Ricketts, T. H.: The matrix matters: Effective isolation in fragmented landscapes, Am. Nat., 158, 87–99, https://doi.org/10.1086/320863, 2001.
Ries, L., Fletcher, R. J., Battin, J., and Sisk, T. D.: Ecological responses to habitat edges: Mechanisms, models, and variability explained, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S., 35, 491–522, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130148, 2004.
Rothermel, B. B.: Migratory success of juveniles: A potential constraint on connectivity for pond-breeding amphibians, Ecol. Appl., 14, 1535–1546, 2004.
Semlitsch, R. D.: Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians, J. Wildlife Manage., 72, 260–267, https://doi.org/10.2193/2007-082, 2008.
Sinsch, U.: Orientation and navigation in Amphibia, Mar. Freshw. Behav. Phy., 39, 65–71, https://doi.org/10.1080/10236240600562794, 2006.
Sjögren-Gulve, P.: Spatial movement patterns in frogs: Target-oriented dispersal in the pool frog,
Rana lessonae, Ecoscience, 5, 31–38, 1998.
Smith, M. A. and Green, D. M.: Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations?, Ecography, 28, 110–128, 2005.
Todd, B. D. and Rothermel, B. B.: Assessing quality of clearcut habitats for amphibians: Effects on abundances versus vital rates in the southern toad (
Bufo terrestris), Biol. Conserv., 133, 178–185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.003, 2006.
Tramontano, R.: The post-breeding migration of the European common frog,
Rana temporaria: effects of landscape structure and seasonal weather, Lund University, Lund, 1998.
Vos, C. C. and Chardon, J. P.: Effects of habitat fragmentation and road density on the distribution pattern of the moor frog
Rana arvalis, J. Appl. Ecol., 35, 44–56, 1998.
Watling, J. I., Nowakowski, A. J., Donnelly, M. A., and Orrock, J. L.: Meta-analysis reveals the importance of matrix composition for animals in fragmented habitat, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 20, 209–217, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00586.x, 2011.
Wiens, J. A.: Metapopulation Dynamics and Landscape Ecology, in: Metapopulation Biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution, edited by: Hanski, I. and Gilpin, M. E., Academic Press, Inc., 1997.
Wilensky, U.: NetLogo, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo, 1999.
